Hylton-Potts Law Blog

Legal Issues and Opinions affecting people from across the UK


Rodney Hylton-Potts interview with Radio Suffolk

Rodney Hylton-Potts is a recognised expert lawyer at benefit and tax credit fraud, and his views are frequently sought by the media. There follows a radio interview he gave on 1 July 2013, with solid and practical tips on what to do if you are in trouble.


Online Sales

I have an online store but only ship to domestic buyers. If I open up the service to international buyers, are there any regulations or laws I need to know about? Do you have any social media legal recommendations? Expanding into international markets could be an excellent strategy for growth. Crossborder sales in Europe alone are expected to grow year-on-year in the online sphere. Outside Europe, China is an increasingly important market (particularly for luxury goods) and is popular with retailers. However, you will need to identify the markets appropriate to your products. There are a number of rules that

Click Here To Read More…


CVA and the last chance saloon

My company is in serious financial difficulty. To avoid administration, we have been advised to put together a restructuring proposal to offer their shareholders who invested. There are concerns that disgruntled shareholders will not support it. Does the company have powers to compel shareholders to agree to the proposal if it is in the company’s best interests? If not, and they reject it, is administration our only option? Once a company is insolvent, the interests of creditors override those of shareholders. It is possible by proposing a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) to sideline shareholders. They get a vote on any

Click Here To Read More…


Small Claims Limit Increased

Subject to exceptions, the small claims limit has gone up to £10,000, so you cannot recover legal costs.   Rule 26.6 provides for the scope of the small claims track. A claim for a remedy for harassment or unlawful eviction relating, in either case, to residential premises shall not be allocated to the small claims track whatever the financial value of the claim. Otherwise, the small claims track will be the normal track for –   Any claim which has a financial value of not more than £10,000 subject to the special provisions about claims for personal injuries and housing

Click Here To Read More…


Case Management and Evidence Changes

Case Management and Evidence Changes This is part of case management changes made to this on 1 April in parts 3, 16-19, of the Civil Procedure Rules, including: 1. It should be more robust, and wherever possible multi-track cases should be case-managed by the same judge throughout 2. Replacement of the allocation questionnaire (AQ) by new directions questionnaires (DQs). There is a new simple DQ for Small Claims Track (to find out whether the parties are willing to try the free small claims mediation scheme and collect email and telephone contact details), and a longer one for Fast Track and

Click Here To Read More…


You’re fired!!!

New reforms impose two barriers designed to stymie vexatious or unmeritorious claims at birth. The prospect of reform has triggered a rush to take advantage of existing rules. One specialist has reported that claims rocketed by 44 per cent in the third quarter of last year, as litigants rushed to avoid the new fees. An aggrieved employee must pay between £160 and £250 to submit a claim and an additional fee of either £250 or £1250 to proceed to a hearing. Lawyers say that litigants who stump up claims fees will be more motivated to see the action through —

Click Here To Read More…


Doctor's legitimate expectation

Court of Appeal Regina (Patel) v General Medical Council Before Lord Dyson, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Lloyd Jones Judgment March 27, 2013 A British resident who had undertaken a long course of study by distance learning at an overseas university relying on e-mail assurances from the defendant, a professional medical body with responsibility for registering doctors, that he would be entitled to register his medical qualification once awarded after completing all the clinical requirements, had a legitimate expectation of registration. The defendant body was not entitled to defeat that expectation by refusing him registration

Click Here To Read More…


Doctor’s legitimate expectation

Court of Appeal Regina (Patel) v General Medical Council Before Lord Dyson, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Lloyd Jones Judgment March 27, 2013 A British resident who had undertaken a long course of study by distance learning at an overseas university relying on e-mail assurances from the defendant, a professional medical body with responsibility for registering doctors, that he would be entitled to register his medical qualification once awarded after completing all the clinical requirements, had a legitimate expectation of registration. The defendant body was not entitled to defeat that expectation by refusing him registration

Click Here To Read More…


Peer-to-peer lending

by Rodney Hylton-Potts   A commercial peer-to-peer lender pools money from various sources (individual savers, pension funds, councils, even government) and lends it to businesses looking for a loan. Interest rates (currently 7-10%) are often lower than those offered by traditional lenders, including banks. This is because peer-to-peer lending schemes are not ‘bricks and mortar’ businesses, but use the internet to bring lenders and borrowers together. Fees are transparent – typically between 2-4% of the amount borrowed. Peer-to-peer lenders do not offer ‘add-on’ products such as swaps, insurance or hedging. Time from application to funds being released is typically 12

Click Here To Read More…


Prest : a very English solution

  This first appeared in the solicitors Journal on 14th of June 2013 and is reproduced with their permission.    In Prest v Petrodel the Supreme Court kept company law principles intact and used property and trust law to reach a fair conclusion – but not all agree with Lord Sumption. Hazel Wright takes a closer look at the decision, while our commentators share their own take on the longer-term implications of the decision (see box below) “Courts exercising family jurisdiction do not occupy a desert island in which general legal concepts are suspended or mean something different”, Lord Sumption said

Click Here To Read More…